Direct Sum Of Groups

In mathematics, a group ''G'' is called the direct sumHomology. Saunders MacLane. Springer, Berlin; Academic Press, New York, 1963.László Fuchs. Infinite Abelian Groups of two normal subgroups with trivial intersection if it is generated by the subgroups. In abstract algebra, this method of construction of groups can be generalized to direct sums of vector spaces, modules, and other structures; see the article direct sum of modules for more information. A group which can be expressed as a direct sum of non-trivial subgroups is called ''decomposable'', and if a group cannot be expressed as such a direct sum then it is called ''indecomposable''.

Definition

A group ''G'' is called the direct sum of two subgroups ''H''₁ and ''H''₂ if
* each ''H''₁ and ''H''₂ are normal subgroups of ''G'',
* the subgroups ''H''₁ and ''H''₂ have trivial intersection (i.e., having only the identity element $e$ of ''G'' in common),
* ''G'' = ⟨''H''₁, ''H''₂⟩; in other words, ''G'' is generated by the subgroups ''H''₁ and ''H''₂.

More generally, ''G'' is called the direct sum of a finite set of subgroups if
* each ''H''_''i'' is a normal subgroup of ''G'',
* each ''H''_''i'' has trivial intersection with the subgroup ,
* ''G'' = ⟨⟩; in other words, ''G'' is generated by the subgroups .

If ''G'' is the direct sum of subgroups ''H'' and ''K'' then we write , and if ''G'' is the direct sum of a set of subgroups then we often write ''G'' = Σ''H''_''i''. Loosely speaking, a direct sum is isomorphic to a weak direct product of subgroups.

Properties

If , then it can be proven that:

* for all ''h'' in ''H'', ''k'' in ''K'', we have that
* for all ''g'' in ''G'', there exists unique ''h'' in ''H'', ''k'' in ''K'' such that
* There is a cancellation of the sum in a quotient; so that is isomorphic to ''H''

The above assertions can be generalized to the case of , where is a finite set of subgroups:

* if , then for all ''h''_''i'' in ''H''_''i'', ''h''_''j'' in ''H''_''j'', we have that
* for each ''g'' in ''G'', there exists a unique set of elements ''h''_''i'' in ''H''_''i'' such that
:''g'' = ''h''₁ ∗ ''h''₂ ∗ ... ∗ ''h''_''i'' ∗ ... ∗ ''h''_''n''
* There is a cancellation of the sum in a quotient; so that is isomorphic to Σ''H''_''i''.

Note the similarity with the direct product, where each ''g'' can be expressed uniquely as
:''g'' = (''h''₁,''h''₂, ..., ''h''_''i'', ..., ''h''_''n'').

Since for all , it follows that multiplication of elements in a direct sum is isomorphic to multiplication of the corresponding elements in the direct product; thus for finite sets of subgroups, Σ''H''_''i'' is isomorphic to the direct product ×.

Direct summand

Given a group $G$, we say that a subgroup $H$ is a direct summand of $G$ if there exists another subgroup $K$ of $G$ such that $G = H+K$.

In abelian groups, if $H$ is a divisible subgroup of $G$, then $H$ is a direct summand of $G$.

Examples

* If we take $G= \prod_ H_i$ it is clear that $G$ is the direct product of the subgroups $H_ \times \prod_H_i$.

* If $H$ is a divisible subgroup of an abelian group $G$ then there exists another subgroup $K$ of $G$ such that $G=K+H$.
* If $G$ also has a vector space structure then $G$ can be written as a direct sum of $\mathbb R$ and another subspace $K$ that will be isomorphic to the quotient $G/K$.

Equivalence of decompositions into direct sums

In the decomposition of a finite group into a direct sum of indecomposable subgroups the embedding of the subgroups is not unique. For example, in the Klein group $V_4 \cong C_2 \times C_2$ we have that
: $V_4 = \langle(0,1)\rangle + \langle(1,0)\rangle,$ and
: $V_4 = \langle(1,1)\rangle + \langle(1,0)\rangle.$

However, the Remak-Krull-Schmidt theorem states that given a ''finite'' group ''G'' = Σ''A''_''i'' = Σ''B''_''j'', where each ''A''_''i'' and each ''B''_''j'' is non-trivial and indecomposable, the two sums have equal terms up to reordering and isomorphism.

The Remak-Krull-Schmidt theorem fails for infinite groups; so in the case of infinite ''G'' = ''H'' + ''K'' = ''L'' + ''M'', even when all subgroups are non-trivial and indecomposable, we cannot conclude that ''H'' is isomorphic to either ''L'' or ''M''.

Generalization to sums over infinite sets

To describe the above properties in the case where ''G'' is the direct sum of an infinite (perhaps uncountable) set of subgroups, more care is needed.

If ''g'' is an element of the cartesian product Π of a set of groups, let ''g''_''i'' be the ''i''th element of ''g'' in the product. The external direct sum of a set of groups (written as Σ_''E'') is the subset of Π, where, for each element ''g'' of Σ_''E'', ''g''_''i'' is the identity $e_$ for all but a finite number of ''g''_''i'' (equivalently, only a finite number of ''g''_''i'' are not the identity). The group operation in the external direct sum is pointwise multiplication, as in the usual direct product.

This subset does indeed form a group, and for a finite set of groups the external direct sum is equal to the direct product.

If ''G'' = Σ''H''_''i'', then ''G'' is isomorphic to Σ_''E''. Thus, in a sense, the direct sum is an "internal" external direct sum. For each element ''g'' in ''G'', there is a unique finite set ''S'' and a unique set such that ''g'' = Π .

See also

*Direct sum
*Coproduct
*Free product
*Direct sum of topological groups

References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Direct Sum Of Groups
Group theory